Should Fallen Preacher’s Be Restored?

Monday, April 7, 2008

It has always saddened me over the years as I've watched church leaders bring a reproach on the church of Jesus Christ. What’s shocking to me is how frequently Christian leaders sin grossly, then step back into leadership almost as soon as the publicity dies away.

Some time ago I received a cassette tape that disturbed me greatly. It was a recording of the re-commissioning service of a pastor who had made national news by confessing to an adulterous affair. After little more than a year of “counseling and rehabilitation,” this man was returning to public ministry with his church’s blessing.

That is happening everywhere. Restoration teams—equipped with manuals to instruct the church on how to reinstate their fallen pastor—wait like tow-truck drivers on the side of the highway, anticipating the next leadership “accident”. Our church has received inquiries wondering if we have written guidelines or a workbook to help restore fallen pastors to leadership. Many no doubt expect that a church like ours would have a systematic rehabilitation program for sinning leaders.

Gross sin among Christian leaders is a signal that something is seriously wrong with the church. But an even greater problem is the lowering of standards to accommodate a leader’s sin. That the church is so eager to bring these men back into leadership is a symptom of rottenness at the core.

Some have claimed that a leader’s failure makes him more effective in shepherding fallen people. That is ludicrous. Should we drag the bottom of sin’s cesspool for the most heinous sinners to lead the church? Are they better able to understand the sinner? Certainly not! Our pattern for ministry is the sinless Son of God. The church is to be like Him and her leaders are to be our models of Christ-likeness.

We must recognize that leadership in the church cannot be regarded lightly. The foremost requirement of a church leader is that he be above reproach (1 Timothy 3:2, 10; Titus 1:7). That is a difficult prerequisite, and not everyone can meet it.

There are some sins that irreparably shatter a man’s reputation and disqualify him from a ministry of leadership forever. Even Paul, man of God that he was, said he feared such a possibility. In 1 Corinthians 9:27 he says, “But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway.” So Paul alludes to the fact that spiritual leaders can disqualify themselves from strategic roles of leadership.

When referring to his body, Paul obviously had sexual immorality in view. In 1 Corinthians 6:18 he describes it as a sin against one’s own body—sexual sin is in its own category. Certainly it disqualifies a man from church leadership since he permanently forfeits a blameless reputation as a one-woman man (Proverbs 6:33; 1 Timothy 3:2).

Where did we get the idea that a years leave of absence and some counseling can restore integrity to someone who has squandered his reputation and destroyed people’s trust? Certainly not from the Bible. Trust forfeited is not so easily regained. Once purity is sacrificed, the ability to lead by example is lost forever. As one preacher commented when referring to this issue—it takes only one pin to burst a balloon.

What about forgiveness? Shouldn’t we be eager to restore our fallen brethren? To fellowship, yes. But not to leadership. It is not an act of love to return a disqualified man to public ministry; it is an act of disobedience.
By all means we should be forgiving. But we cannot erase the consequences of sin. I am not advocating that we “shoot our wounded.” I’m simply saying that we shouldn’t rush them back to the front lines, and we should not put them in charge of other soldiers. The church should do everything possible to minister to those who have sinned and repented. But that does not include restoring the mantle of leadership to a man who has disqualified himself and forfeited the right to lead. Doing so is unbiblical and lowers the standard God has set.

So why is the contemporary church so eager to be tolerant? I’m certain a major reason is the sin and unbelief that pervade the church. If casual Christians can lower the expectations on their leadership, they will be much more comfortable with their own sin. With lower moral standards, the church becomes more tolerant of sin and less tolerant of holiness. The “sinner-friendly” church is intolerable to God—that is a frightening condition.

Another obvious reason why the church has compromised in this area is due to the influence and misinterpretation of scripture of those who have fallen. It’s enlightening that those who make the greatest appeal for forgiveness and restoration to places of leadership are those who have previously fallen. They demand acceptance and intimidate anyone who rejects their plea for reinstatement as being unchristian. Such an approach is presented upon the erroneous assumption that “once repentance is embraced and forgiveness is granted” that the standard of disqualification from leadership is somehow nullified. The reality is that sin is forgivable, but in specific cases the consequences of sin live on. Incredibly the one who once held to a high standard for leadership, more often than not, reverses their position when they become the culprit. The next step for the one who refuses to relinquish their coveted place of leadership is to then convince themselves and others to lower the standard. Once that occurs, toleration breeds and perpetuates itself.

Conservative Christians have for most of the previous century focused on the battle for doctrinal purity. And that is good. But we are losing the battle for moral purity. Some of the worst defeats have occurred among our more visible leaders. The church cannot lower the standard to accommodate them. We should hold it higher so we can regain purity. If we lose here, we have utterly failed, no matter how orthodox our confession of faith. We can’t win if we compromise the biblical standard of moral purity.

What should you do in the current crisis?

1st : Pray for your church's leaders. The pressure of expectations and responsibility can sometimes be enormous. Satan's attack is relentlessly aimed at those in positions of authority.

2nd : Encourage them. Many are their detractors. Allies are needed and in most cases make the difference between serving with joy or grief.

3rd : Submit to their God-given authority and follow them as they follow God. The scripture refers to the Pastor of your church as your spiritual ruler, which means that your failure to follow his instruction and example classifies you as a spiritual rebel.

4th : Understand that no one is perfect, nonetheless we should never forget that Biblical qualifications hold our spiritual leaders to the highest level of godliness and purity. Everyone in a Christ honoring church is accountable to the Will of God and the Word of God, including its leaders. The church must have leaders who are genuinely above reproach. Anything less is an abomination.

- Some variations to this article were made by our Pastor